Tuesday, October 31, 2006

Worst.....Predictions.....Ever!

I couldn't have been more wrong with my predictions throughout the baseball playoffs. I succeeded in picking 6 of the 7 playoff series wrong, with my only correct one being the Mets over the Dodgers, in the first round, and I came very, very close to picking the Dodgers as my "surprise" pick. Anyways, as many writers have said, this year saw some of the worst playoff series ever played. The Tigers rolled over the listless Yankees. The Twins made a lot of uncharacteristic mistakes to get swept by the A's. The Padres failed to turn the tables on the Cardinals, whose record was so bad they really didn't belong in the playoffs to begin with, just like last year's Padres. The Mets buried the Dodgers in boring fashion. Did the Tigers-A's series even happen, or did the A's just forfeit? The one series that could have been good, the Cardinals and Mets, was tarnished because A) The Cardinals W-L record was worse than 8 out of 14 AL teams (more than half!!!!) and B) Both pitching staffs were so messed up that the fans of just about any of the other 28 teams were wishing that their team could face either team in the NLCS. The World Series will be remembered for a 40+ pitcher cheating after being declared a changed man by the media a year after beating up a cameraman for no reason, the Tigers not being able to execute basic little league defensive skills, and a team that had a worse record than the Philadelphia Phillies and Toronto Blue Jays at just 4 games over .500 winning the World Series. Don't get me wrong....I sorta like the Cardinals because their fans hate the Cubs just like Sox fans, so I'm sure their win with the Sox win last year added to the misery of the Cubs, which is always fun. But I think baseball fans for now need to put 2006 behind them and hope 2007 is a little more entertaining.


On to the BCS.
Conference Leaders (Ties broken by BCS rank)
ACC: Boston College (15)
Big 12: Texas (7)
Big East: West Virginia (3)
Big Ten: Ohio State (1)
C-USA: Tulsa (NR)
MAC: Central Michigan (NR)
Mountain West: BYU (NR)
PAC-10: California (10)
SEC: Florida (4)
Sun Belt: Middle Tennessee State (NR)
WAC: Boise State (14)

At-Large Teams: Michigan (2), Louisville (5), Auburn (6), USC (8), Notre Dame (9)

First Round Matchups
#1 Ohio State vs. #16 Middle Tennessee State
#8 USC vs. #9 Notre Dame
#4 Florida vs. #13 Tulsa
#5 Louisville vs. #12 Boston College
#3 West Virginia vs. #14 BYU
#6 Auburn vs. #11 Boise State
#7 Texas vs. #10 California
#2 Michigan vs. #15 Central Michigan

Sunday, October 22, 2006

World Series/BCS Update

First off, I didn't get a chance to weigh in on the World Series yet. I'm going to pick the Tigers in 6, despite last nights deabacle. This was also my pick before the series started. My reasoning behind this pick is pretty simple. The American League is superior, and they've proved it with Interleague play and the All-Star Game. Plus, the Cardinals had the 5th best record in the National League, and can become the team with the worst regular season record to win the World Series by winning 3 more games. Another factor that plays into favor for the AL from a history standpoint is that they have won 15 of the last 22 World Series, going back to 1983. Maybe more interesting in that time period is that the AL is 12-1 when they've had home field advantage, with only the schizo 2003 Yankees blowing the advantage of playing 4 games in New York. Maybe there is more to the DH helping the AL than we thought.....(As an AL fan though, I'm not knocking the DH, I think the NL just fears progress, or maybe they should make more of an effort to get another bat before the trade deadline so they wouldn't have to use a backup catcher to fill the spot in October)

On to the College Football Playoff plan. The BCS was just released, so here we go again...
Conference Leaders (Ties broken by BCS rank)
ACC: Clemson (12)
Big 12: Texas (7)
Big East: West Virginia (4)
Big Ten: Ohio State (1)
C-USA: Tulsa (NR)
MAC: Kent State (NR)
Mountain West: BYU (NR)
PAC-10: USC (3)
SEC: Florida (6) - Auburn is ranked higher, but does not lead division
Sun Belt: Arkansas State (NR)
WAC: Boise State (15)


At-Large Teams: Michigan (2), Auburn (5), Louisville (8), Notre Dame (9), California (10)

First Round Matchups:
#1 Ohio State vs. #16 Arkansas State
#8 Louisville vs. #9 Notre Dame
#4 West Virginia vs. #13 Tulsa
#5 Auburn vs. #12 Boise State
#3 USC vs. #14 BYU
#6 Florida vs. #11 Clemson
#7 Texas vs. #10 California
#2 Michigan vs. #15 Kent State

2nd Round Matchups if Favorites win: Ohio State vs. Louisville, West Virginia vs. Auburn, USC vs. Florida, Texas vs. Michigan

Semi-Finals Matchups if Favorites win: Ohio State vs. West Virginia, USC vs. Michigan

I added those next round matchups just to show that for Ohio State to be crowned National Champs in this system, they'd have to beat 3 teams in a row that are currently undefeated. Those teams will probably have losses by the time January rolls around, but this would truly earn someone the title of national champs while entertaining the fans greatly in the process. We'll see how this Saturday changes things....

Monday, October 16, 2006

My College Football Tournament Idea

The first BCS rankings come out yesterday (and shockingly, my Purdue Boilermakers' 31-10 win at Northwestern was not enough to get them in ;-) , and once again the talk is out about how the system is flawed and there needs to be a tournament. Opponents always say that the universities need to hold their players to high academic standards and with the tourney, they'd miss too much class and possibly finals.....and I say, what a load of crap. Let's face it, each year, the players on the top BCS teams are not majoring in Geography, Undergrad Studies, or Philosophy. They are majoring in Football with their career in mind being the NFL, and if that's not their goal, they probably should have picked a more promising major with their free ride through college. Also, no one seems to complain about basketball where there is a 30+ game schedule sometimes (where a lot of games are played on weekday nights), a conference tournament, and a 64-team tournament that lasts 3 weekends. Obviously, the 6 BCS conferences, Notre Dame, and the Bowl Games are holding back progress with their exclusive TV deals and the lesser bowls complaining about losing their luster (like they ever had any to begin with). But, with all of that aside, here's my plan....

The Basketball tournament is wildly popular by having 34 conference champions had 31 at-large teams, so why not just copy it? People love to pull for an underdog, and giving the 5 smaller conference champs a shot at the title will bring in even more interest. My plan is to have a 16-team tournament with the 11 conference champions and 5 at-large teams, which could be the top 5 teams in the BCS that didn't win a conference. Just like the basketball tournament, their status as a conference champ would not matter in their cede and it could be determined by the BCS or a special committee. So, for example, the Sun Belt champ could be #16 and take on #1 in the first round.

Each week this season, I'm going to post an updated tournament bracket, just to show how intriguing some of these matchups could be....

Conference Leaders (ties or multiple division leaders broken by BCS rank)
ACC: Clemson (12)
Big 12: Texas (9)
Big East: West Virginia (5)
Big Ten: Ohio State (1)
C-USA: Tulsa (25)
MAC: Kent State (NR)
Mountain West: BYU (NR)
PAC-10: USC (2)
SEC: Florida (6)
Sun Belt: Arkansas State (NR)
WAC: Boise State (15)

At-Large Teams - Michigan (3), Auburn (4), Louisville (7), Notre Dame (8), California (10)

First Round Matchups
#1 Ohio State vs. #16 Arkansas State
#8 Notre Dame vs. #9 Texas
#4 Auburn vs. #13 Tulsa
#5 West Virginia vs. #12 Boise State
#3 Michigan vs. #14 BYU
#6 Florida vs. #11 Clemson
#7 Louisville vs. #10 California
#2 USC vs. #15 Kent State

Let me know what you think and I'll post an updated bracket next week.

Monday, October 09, 2006

LCS Picks

Since my LDS picks were so amazing (completely wrong), I figured I'd let the world (hardly anyone) know what I feel about the upcoming LCS. Ryan made his picks on Victoria Times, so you can check his picks out and compare them to mine....maybe he'll have better luck than me

ALCS
Oakland Athletics vs. Detroit Tigers
How dare I retract my statements from August, where I declared Detroit the 2006 team of destiny. In my ALDS predictions, I completely wrote the Tigers off, claiming that they did not fulfill the destiny of last year's White Sox by hanging onto the AL Central Title and carrying that momentum into the playoffs. Apparently, they didn't need it. They staggered into the playoffs only the turn around after game 1 and crush the Yankees, who are quickly becoming the new Atlanta Braves. I just wonder if George Steinbrenner will start showing 2nd rate pro wrestling and crappy movies while the hosts cook lamely named meals on the YES network as well. The team I was quick to name the team of destiny, the Twins, did not play in the playoffs like they did down the stretch at all by making costly defensive mistakes and being impatient at the plate (I stole that from Ryan....I didn't actually watch any of the games because of work). So since I totally didn't expect these teams to be facing each other in the ALCS, I have no idea who is going to win. Both teams are pretty evenly matched with their decent pitching and timely hitting by a solid lineup from top to bottom. I never would have guessed 6 or 7 years ago that Frank Thomas would be facing Magglio Ordonez with a trip to the World Series on the line. Since my heart is still with Frank Thomas, and the A's have home field advantage because they were division champions, I'm leaning toward the A's in this series, especially if their pitching can perform the way the did against Minnesota. Plus, I think Detroit celebrated their win against the Yankees a little TOO much. I know its been 19 years, but uh, you still need to win 8 more games to have something real to celebrate, guys.
Pick: A's in 7

NLCS
St. Louis Cardinals vs. New York Mets
The Cardinals decided to come to life in the playoffs, proving me wrong yet again. The Mets looked much more impressive against the Dodgers than I would have guessed, despite their depleted pitching staff. The Cardinals have a stronger lineup to combat those Mets pitchers, but I think the Mets just have too much talent to not win this series and rightfully go to the World Series, since they are the only team that deserves it in the NL. I really could care less about the NL, and I'm pretty sure their champion will lose the World Series since the Yankees or Cleveland aren't going to be there this year (the last non-Cleveland or Yankees AL team to lose the World Series was Oakland in 1990), so since I want to go to bed I think I'll just leave it at that.
Pick: Mets in 5

Now check out Ryan's picks and see if we should be bickering like grumpy old men.

Monday, October 02, 2006

The Quick and Dirty Playoff Picks

I'd like to start off by retracting my post from about 2 months ago, where I called the Tigers the team of destiny, much like last year's White Sox. Unlike the the Sox, they didn't rally at the end of the season to hold onto the division title, and now they are like a 3-legged kitten limping into a pitbull house named Yankee Stadium. Now its almost looking like the Twins are the team of destiny, or maybe this is the Yankees year to restake their usual claim on top of baseball's mountain. Only time will tell. For now, let's get onto my first round picks for the playoffs.

National (Minor) League
Los Angeles Dodgers vs. New York Mets
The Dodgers head into the playoffs as the hottest team in baseball, winning their last 7 in a row to hold off the Phillies for the wild card and coming up just short of taking the NL West title from the Padres. Now they go on the road to face the Mets, who have been on cruise control for the past few months. The Mets were about to come into the playoffs rested and ready, but Pedro Martinez's injuries have thrown their rotation into disarray. Now they are relying on Orlando Hernandez, (who has been excellent in the playoffs, but how much does he have left?), Tom Glavine (there's a reason the Braves only won one World Series), Steve Trachsel (only one quality start in September), and John Maine (unproven semi-rookie). Their lineup, however, has star power from top to bottom and they could easily ride the bats of Beltran, Wright, Delgado, and everyone else all the way to the World Series. The Dodgers have a strange mix of youngsters and veterans with only a little left in the tank. You can even see it in the pitching staff with 40 year-old Greg Maddux being followed in the rotation by 22 year-old Chad Billingsley. The Dodgers are also one of the streakiest teams I've ever seen. They had a stretch following the all-star break where they went 1-13 in 14 games, then followed that by a 17-1 run in the next 18. Is their 7 game win streak going to turn into a 10? or maybe a 3 game losing streak? There's no way to tell. I'm going to go with neither, and the Mets will pull out a dramatic game 5 win in Shea.
Pick: Mets in 5

St. Louis Cardinals vs. San Diego Padres

Last year, the Padres were a sorry excuse for a playoff team, winning the miserable NL West with a record barely above .500. I was telling people that if there was any justice out there, the 100-win Cardinals would sweep them out of the playoffs, which they did. This year, the tables have turned. Sure, the Padres were far from 100 wins, but no one has ever entered the playoffs ass-first like the Cardinals have. I'm not even going to bother going into player matchups, because the Cardinals chances of winning relies on the one man that just barely got them into the playoffs in the first place (and could earn him the MVP), Albert Pujols. If Pujols produces and the rest of the team can step it up a notch, they could advance, if not, they'll be swept. I think Pujols will get them a win in game 3 at Busch, but Trevor Hoffman will shut the door on their season in the next game.
Pick: Padres in 4

American League
Detroit Tigers vs. New York Yankees

I already discussed the Tigers a little above, and I'm still amazed by what happened to them. They had me absolutely convinced that they would not fade, and they managed to do it with 2 weeks to go, yet still make the playoffs. Now, instead of hosting Oakland for 2 games in a raucous Comerica Park to start their first playoff run in 19 years, they stumble into Yankee Stadium. Jim Leyland has done some amazing things as manager, but I don't think he'll be able to motivate this relatively young team to turn it around and defeat one of the better Yankee teams in years. Speaking of the Yankees, despite all of their injuries throughout the season, they still managed to win the AL East by 10 games over 2 teams that had a better record than the Cardinals. Now, heading into the playoffs, they finally have Sheffield and Matsui back to go along with A-Rod, Jeter (who had his best offensive year), Abreu, Damon, Cano, Posada, and, whew....this team is stacked. Their pitching is not the best in the playoffs, but it is enough to take them to the promised land and snap their 6-year "curse." But first things first....
Pick: Yankees in 3

Oakland Athletics vs. Minnesota Twins
After looking pretty miserable to start the season, the Twins have been unstoppable in June and the 2nd half of the season, carrying them all the way to the AL Central title. Their offense is lead by Morneau, Mauer, and Cuddyer, who unfortunately, does not have 3 consecutive vowels in his last name. There's also a Torii, who should add a third "i" just for consistency. Their pitching was lead by the unstoppable Johan Santana and rookie sensation Francisco Liriano, who is now done for the year, and if healthy, would have probably made the Twins the favorite in the AL. Now the rest of their playoff rotation is filled in by Brad Radke, who is held together by staples and duct tape, Carlos Silva, and possibly a 2nd rookie sensation, Matt Garza. The A's have basically been solid and consistent, and I guess rather boring. While the other teams in the AL West were up and down, they just kept plugging way and picking up wins with solid pitching and a solid lineup. Of course, as I mentioned in my last post, I'm jumping on the A's bandwagon because of Frank Thomas, but because of Johan Santana in a short series, 3 games in Minnesota, and no playoff series wins since 1990, despite 5 playoff appearances since then, I'm going with the Twins
Pick: Twins in 4